Both terms occur frequently in legal terminology. It is understood by the damages and losses suffered as a result of the action of another person, while the damage refers to the gain that one fails to obtain the expenses that one has as a consequence of the action or omission of another person.
Damages can be material or symbolic. If a drunk driver crashes his vehicle into the front of a house, he will have caused material damage: the repair of the damage suffered by the construction requires the outlay of money. On the other hand, if a journalist defames a colleague by saying that he is a liar and lacks ethics, there has been symbolic damage.
When we conceptualize these terms legally refer to what someone has to pay compensation for the damages that another person has caused, compensation must be understood not as a punishment or a sanction, Reparation Most claims for damages and damages the plaintiff of not having evidence may lose his claim. As; This type of claim requires a higher degree of legal technique and its primary purpose is to claim compensation for damages.
The requirements that the lawsuit must demonstrate to win the trial are very precise: 1.- That there was a breach. 2.- That this breach was with " fault or negligence". 3.- That the negligent breach that caused the damage was attributable to the defendant, and not to another.
