The Dysthanasia is completely opposite of Euthanasia, it is the opposition that has the patient, family and even doctors to die. Despite all the complications that can arise around a disease, Distanasia can be considered an opportunity for those who do not want to die, but it is important to note that in a society that supports human rights in all its characteristics, Distanasia is considered a " cruelty " against the patient, because generally the patient is subjected to a series of actions that make him suffer without measure.
Distanasia is not about medical cruelty, but if it is very clear that this process delays the patient's rest in peace, there are cases in which the patient has wanted to stop going through everything that is happening with death and is prevented. From this, an opinion matrix is generated in which two sides are established, the first is in favor of rest and a halt to suffering, and the other is that of exhausting all the possibilities for it to live and to overcome disease. Distanasia when applied in diseases that have no cure loses a bit the sense that it presents, the effect that some medicine may have on the patient's health is null or negativeHowever, any method to improve it continues. In these cases, euthanasia would be applied, but it is not done, so it is Distanasia.
This " Survival " method is applied to people who are important to any type of institution, these can be, from families to governments, in which it is not appropriate for one of these to die, Distanasia may seem selfish, because perhaps Functions that a person exercises within society can be supplied by another healthy person, but in this case religious beliefs are also associated on certain "Extreme" occasions, since when we speak of an impossibility to live and eternal rest is not allowed we are speaking of a decision far from reason and congruence with the nature of each person. God's timing is perfect and nothing will change it .
