Moral conscience is called the introspection process in which the human being is able to analyze the attitude that he maintains and, in addition, tries to impose a certain retribution to correct them. It is, in many clinical cases, it is absent; remorse, a consequence of "the little voice of conscience" speaking, is not noticeable or does not exist entirely. For some, moral conscience is the great proof that the human being is very capable and rational, which would differentiate us from the rest of the species present in the animal kingdom. It should be noted that the nature of this is completely subjective, since it is a product of the mind, in addition to the education and cultural background that the individual has.
Morality is one of the many aspects of human life, which have great value for people, as it would denote whether their attitudes, within the parameters under which they were raised, are correct or lack morals. This rectitude can be transmitted, due to the influence of the social environment in which the individual is, in addition to the culture that is lived in the place; however, some nuances can be acquired by the person's own experiences. It is from this that the person will have certain values, as well as the decisions that they can make in the future will be defined. Some even go so far as to locate the origin of this in supernatural beliefs.
Various hypotheses have been generated as to how moral conscience works. The moral intellectualism suggests that it is the knowledge and reason which can show us what is good and what is bad. Emotionalism, for its part, says that analysis and reasoning only collaborate in the process in a general way, because feelings are the decisive factor. Meanwhile, intuitionism affirms that none of the above would serve to explain the functioning of this consciousness, but that it would have the understanding of good and evil directly. The prescriptivists, finally, dictate that it is only the judgment of the person who can determine if their behavior is good or bad.
