Psychology

What is democratic leadership? »Its definition and meaning

Anonim

It is the type of leadership carried out by a person who takes into account the participation of the other members that make up an organization, accepting the ideas and criticisms that they may have in order to improve, in addition to answering any concerns that the people under They have their position, which generates trust among their subordinates, this encourages teamwork and in turn to achieve the objectives set.

In the company, this type of leadership is characterized by encouraging the participation of employees in decision-making, which makes them feel comfortable working in it and that the motivation to do the job well increases, when implementing measures, these are first consulted by workers to ask for their opinion without the word of one being worth less than that of another and where the leader can offer solutions in case they do not agree with the measure, making that decision something democratic.

A democratic leader is characterized by delegating functions, this in order to lighten the workload that may fall on him, he always looks for a way that all the people who are under his charge feel comfortable with what is being done and if not, he tries to listen to what people have to say and then he offers his possible solutions, in order to solve the problem, he is always aware that each and every one of the workers participate in the activities without doing any discrimination, he always listens to the opinions, suggestions and ideas that others may contribute regardless of whether he agrees or not, and even encourages this type of intervention.

Democratic leadership is characterized by promoting the initiative and creativity of other people, which facilitates the collaboration of workers, also creates a bond between workers and the leader, helps the growth and development of the company's workers, all this can be advantageous for the company since employees feel comfortable and can create a great sense of belonging, which is reflected in the employee's results.

Although this leadership is considered one of the best, it also has some flaws, for example, sometimes it is impossible to reach an agreement between two or more parties regarding a decision since even if the majority agrees, it will always exist the minority that does not support it, if all trust is placed in the workers, it may at some point that the workers deviate from the goal to be achieved, the leader may face harsh criticism and even attitudes of contempt, it may also be that setting an objective is delayed since it must first be debated in order to reach an agreement.